Andrey Semashev wrote:
On Friday 13 December 2013 12:23:06 Adam Wulkiewicz wrote:
Let me know what do you think about it. And don't hesitate to write about your ideas or propose changes. I've taken a look at some of the logos. I don't quite like the specialized Boost icons on the left. I'd prefer the common Boost icon to be used without modifications, its white-blue color scheme looks more stylish to me.
Ok, and what do you think about those simple ones, without additional colors? http://github.com/awulkiew/boost-logos/blob/master/config.png http://github.com/awulkiew/boost-logos/blob/master/inspect.png http://github.com/awulkiew/boost-logos/blob/master/polygon.png http://github.com/awulkiew/boost-logos/blob/master/utility.png http://github.com/awulkiew/boost-logos/blob/master/quickbook.png
Also, multi-word names of libraries use underscore. Although it's not written anywhere to my knowledge, such names are typically spelled in one word, camelcase, without underscores (e.g. Boost.SmartPtr). Here is the discussion policy:
http://www.boost.org/community/policy.html#lib_names
This may not look very well on the logos though. So it's probably best to stick with the official Boost logo without library names or no logo at all.
Yes, the naming scheme worked well with the Geometry and later I just followed it. I tested some other schemes and they look ok: https://github.com/awulkiew/boost-logos/blob/master/smart_ptr.png Regards, Adam