11 Mar
2014
11 Mar
'14
4:45 p.m.
AMDG On 03/11/2014 09:22 AM, TONGARI J wrote:
Hi folks,
I know it'd be better to say "overload", but I choose the word carefully because I'm aware of Boost.OverloadedFunction, which is not what I'm talking here (it's complementary, though).
What I want is to have std/boost::function support multi-signature itself, instead of relying on some external wrapper which is less efficient. For example:
http://www.boost.org/doc/html/boost_typeerasure/examples.html#boost_typeeras... In Christ, Steven Watanabe