Re: [boost] The standard library is better documented

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 8:36 AM Hans Dembinski wrote:

...

On 2. Dec 2023, at 16:57, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell via Boost wrote:

It would be useful if you could point to instances of Boost libraries that could use better documentation.

Can we organise a user poll that ranks all Boost libraries on how well documented they are?

Might be a fun way to approach this and it provides an opportunity to create some publicity for Boost when we advertise this. I can see the news headline: "Boost devs finally respond to user cries for better docs"

I think the results would be very interesting. The top libraries on this list would then serve as examples for everyone else.

We could repeat this poll in regular intervals to reward improvements in documentation.

Sounds like a good/fun idea to me. -- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supone Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net