On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 11/18/17 00:36, Zach Laine via Boost wrote:
Not only do I want to see this put forth for review, but I'd also like to see its review fast-tracked, since it's a target for standardization currently being examined by LEWG.
Not knowing anything about `polymorphic_value`, I welcome a new library submitted for a review, but I don't see why the review should be fast-tracked. Fast-tracked reviews are typically performed on something that the community is very familiar with (not only the concept but the implementation as well), which basically means it has to undergo a full review first. That the library is also being reviewed by someone else (e.g. LEWG) does not mean it has a free entry into Boost.
Agreed. What I meant by fast-tracked wasn't that it should be reviewed differently, but that the review should happen sooner. Zach