I realize I'm jumping in on a conversation that I'm not involved in but as mostly a user of Boost libraries, I for one would encourage you to think about the users and their needs more than what you the developer think is important. This is one critical piece of feedback you're getting, and I seriously hope you consider prioritizing this in your continued development of Boost.Fiber.
Thanks Michael!
Did I say that I'll ignore Hartmuts concerns? For Hartmut only speed matters and I've agreed that I'll address this issue.
I've never said that it's only speed that matters. I said that because the API is set there is only performance which could be used as a criteria to decide whether your library is a worthy addition to Boost (besides implementation quality, which is sub-standard as others have pointed out). Regards Hartmut --------------- http://boost-spirit.com http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu