On April 2, 2015 8:49:28 AM EDT, Niall Douglas
One of the things I was going to recommend at Robert's Boost 2.0 talk at C++ Now was that if a Boost ready library does not see a review after three years, and during that time it has remained maintained to the same quality as a Boost library, it should enter Boost regardless. Whilst peer review is important, it is impractical for very niche libraries, and where the quality of implementation, documentation, testing, maintainance and the maintainer are all up to Boost standards repeatedly demonstrated over a three year period then peer review is in my opinion dispensible.
We determine that a library is up to Boost standard through the peer review process. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)