24 Sep
2013
24 Sep
'13
4:12 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
I could change it if there is an agreement of the Boost community.
(sorry for the delay, I missed this one) I agree that it should be changed, in synchronized_value the value part is not necessary, and very verbose. I have another question: Why is there no move operator? I see a move constructor but no move operator, but I suppose it could be implemented if T is movable? Or is it not possible?