Re: [boost] [container] static_string ?

14 Sep 2019

      On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 2:21 PM Roberto Hinz via Boost
 wrote:
...
Perhaps we could do as Vinnie said, but just name the function
as `terminate()` instead of `c_str()`.
Would this be OK?

    template 
    class static_string
    {
        mutable char buf_[N+1];
    public:
        ...
        char const*
        c_str() const noexcept
        {
            buf_[size()] = '\0';
            return buf_;
        }
    };

Or we could just leave it the way that it is, and pay for keeping the
string null terminated at all times, that's not so bad really.

Regards

Re: [boost] [container] static_string ?

Vinnie Falco