17 May
2016
17 May
'16
5:59 p.m.
David Sankel wrote:
Boost cannot evolve the way it has in the past. When it was getting started, we didn't have over-representation of groups who benefit from the status-quo. We didn't have the idea of servicing the "Boost community" instead of the "C++ community".
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. What is this hypothetical "Boost community" that is supposedly being served? What are those over-represented groups? Are you referencing something with which I am not familiar?