Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library

25 Oct 2016


      2016-10-24 21:49 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed :
...
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Antony Polukhin  wrote:
<...>
...
More problems will arise with source
files and line numbers. May be you'd like a different solution? What
for are you willing to have such precise control?
As I said, I want to be able to extract particular pieces of
information without having to maintain backend-specific parsing of the
string you emit.
Ultimately, of course, it's all for human consumption, but you can't
know the format I will consider ideal.
It's great to be able to extract a single stacktrace entry, and it's
good to have a "good enough" default formatting, but I'm just telling
you what I would like even better.  ;-)
Started implementing that: added begin/end functions, iterator and
class frame. Is it ok to have a nonmovable type for a stack frame?

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin