On Friday 19 September 2014 22:21:27 Suckow, Thomas J wrote:
There¹s been some list discussion but my overall concern is that
we can¹t clearly explain why some develop testers are broken and others
are
working okay. The commit completely broke Darwin, Debian, FreeBSD, QNX
and
Windows. But what¹s really worrying is that some RHEL testers are still merrily cycling while other RHEL testers are broken. Same for Ubuntu,
some
are cycling okay while some are broken.
Based on my limited testing, it would appear to me that it works on systems with headers from another version of boost in /usr/include or /usr/local/include.
That's an interesting idea. MPL didn't change for quite a while, so it could work. Noel, if you have access to a running tester, could you verify this theory?