3 Nov
2018
3 Nov
'18
2:24 p.m.
On 11/3/18 4:49 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
I'm not adamantly against it, not to the point I would rewrite Boost.Log just to stay C++03 compatible.
Going that far may be unnecessary; we could just fork a `parameter03` so that C++03 libraries can keep using it.
Technically, this is a possibility. Practically, I don't think this would be good for Boost.Parameter users. The forks will have to have separate interfaces to not clash. Then there are interoperability issues. No, if we definitely don't want to preserve C++03 compatibility then let's just switch to C++11 in (the only) Boost.Parameter and declare downstream libraries C++11 as well.