What do you propose to do with libraries that want to keep C++03 compatibility and rely on Boost.Test in tests?
Demand that they be upgraded or drop them in favour of better-behaved ones. Only the future is ahead. The past is irrelevant. A library that demands c++03 is not a c++ library. It’s merely a blocker to productivity. It must adapt or die.
On 9 Feb 2018, at 09:45, Andrey Semashev via Boost
wrote: On 02/09/18 12:13, Olaf van der Spek via Boost wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost
wrote: * is there any better option? All the other options I see are even worse. Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on these issues?
What do you propose to do with libraries that want to keep C++03 compatibility and rely on Boost.Test in tests?
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost