17 Feb
2015
17 Feb
'15
8:38 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Niall Douglas
On 17 Feb 2015 at 0:56, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
[Niall Douglas]
what's the point of keeping static libs?
Redist unnecessary, single executable, immunity to DLL replacement mischief (consider antivirus products).
Have the problems with mixing binaries compiled against the DLL with others compiled against the static lib been fixed in the new refactor?
AFAIK DLLs should always use the DLL CRT. -- Olaf