Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [typeindex v3.0] Peer review begins Mon 21st ends Wed 30th

2014-04-25 11:25 GMT+04:00 Dominique Devienne :

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:

...

On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Niall Douglas < s_sourceforge@nedprod.com>wrote: I was wondering though: - what is the behaviours of pretty_name() when the type is in namespaces (there are no example of this); - what is the behaviours of pretty_name() when the type is in an anonymous namespace?

I had similar questions reading the doc as well.

Or the name of a template full specialization?

But what bothered me a little was the note about the fact that pretty_name() was not consistent across platforms/compilers.

Unfortunately this definitely won't be fixed in nearest releases. Making a generic solution will consume too much time for each compiler and anyway there's no portable way of doing so for anonymous namespaces. There is a an ability to make your own type_indexes, so this could be fixed by user manually. -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin