Re: [boost] Interest in updated, standalone iterator_facade library?

On Aug 12, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Zach Laine via Boost wrote:

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:22 AM Zach Laine wrote:

...

I consider it to be ready, as-is. There may be bugs lurking that need to be fixed, but I don't know of any. I can write every kind of iterator I've ever needed to write (which is a lot). This includes all the iterator categories, plus proxy versions of each, and even weird stuff like back_insert_iterator.

Have you considered an analogy of the Boost iterator_adaptor? That might reduce boilerplate in some useful cases. Cheers, Brook