Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names

11 Jul 2017

      AMDG

On 07/10/2017 08:39 PM, Tom Kent via Boost wrote:
...
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost 
...
wrote:
...
I have prepared the pull requests necessary to encode the address-model
(32 or 64) in the library names, which allows placing the 32/64 libraries
into the same stage/install directory, and building with
address-model=32,64 in one go.
What happens if the user leaves off the address-model parameter entirely? I
seem to recall that in bjam configs the absence of address-model is
different from address-model=32, will that cause different file names?
That used to be the case, but address-model is
now auto-detected by Jamroot.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe