Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal

Please don't top post or overquote on this list. Okay, though it feels strange to reply to the latest post when I actually am commenting on the first one. streambufs have virtual functions which add unwanted generalization for

On 12 Aug 2013 at 13:30 Rob Stewart wrote: this purpose. Why exactly is generalization unwanted? On 12 Aug 2013 at 19:59 Niall Douglas wrote:

I would URGE you to make this exclusively a Boost.ASIO implementation. This is an even better idea. +1.