Re: [boost] What hash functions should be included in a hypothetical Boost hash-v2 library?

I use personally MurmurHash3 because I found open implementations both at compile-time and runtime. Le 31 déc. 2017 01:29, "Peter Dimov via Boost" a écrit :

What (non-cryptographic) hash functions should a hypothetical future Boost hash library contain? Have clear winners emerged by now? Which ones do people prefer?

SipHash is basically a given, but it's not optimized for speed.

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman /listinfo.cgi/boost