26 May
2014
26 May
'14
8:03 a.m.
Vladimir Batov-6 wrote
... try and unify all the input so far into a coherent requirements specs, have it voted and proceed implementing it...
Meant "design specs" rather than "requirements specs"... quite a difference. -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/review-Convert-library-tp4662821p4662879.... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.