On 29 Aug 2015 at 7:57, Robert Ramey wrote:
There have been several suggestions (implicit and explicit) to move this type into the boost::afio namespace, but I haven' seen a response from you. Have I just missed it?
It's more that the suggestion is irrelevant with respect to the library.
It is irrelevant to the operation of the library. But it's certainly no irrelevant with respect to the acceptance of the library. This is exactly the point I was making.
For sure. But please be aware that the use of Monad is more presentational than anything. I foolishly made Monad look like not an internal library in the tutorial, and I have been paying for it since. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/