4 Oct
2016
4 Oct
'16
10:03 p.m.
On 4/10/2016 09:38, Peter Dimov wrote:
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
Whether the new API lives in a top-level namespace (boost::numpy) or not (boost::python::numeric or boost::python::numpy) is secondary IMO.
Logically, if this new library can't be used without Boost.Python, it's more of a sublibrary/extension to Boost.Python rather than a separate library. So it would make more sense, in my opinion, to have it in boost::python.
+1 Boost has a sub-library structure; it should be used for this case. (As a sub-library, it's entirely up to the Boost.Python maintainers and does not require separate review. As a top-level library, it would need at least a mini review, if not a full review. Or at least that's the way I see it.)