27 Sep
2013
27 Sep
'13
11:48 a.m.
On 27 September 2013 12:12, Stephen Kelly
So, if looks like requiring a minimum value for __BORLANDC__ of 0x610, as I have in the patch I posted, is reasonable, right?
No. Someone's still using an older version and I don't see any good reason to stop them. The question is not, "why should we continue to allow an old compiler?", it's "why shouldn't we?".