24 Apr
2014
24 Apr
'14
12:31 p.m.
On 24 Apr 2014 at 10:54, Gavin Lambert wrote:
I don't suppose boost::typeindex would be an improvement? That name at least immediately suggests to the reader which library to look up.
In my opinion, even boost::typeidx would be an improvement over boost::typeind.
+1 to boost::typeindex. (And +0.5 to boost::typeidx.)
So, cumulatively +5 to boost::typeindex then :) Anyone interested in doing the rest of the review of TypeIndex 3.0? Is it now ready to enter Boost? Niall -- Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/