Re: [boost] Boost tests with cmake

Louis Dionne wrote:

If we go Paul's way (which is IMHO the right way in the long term), ...

I've given it some thought and I like the BCM approach; BCM should be a library in libs/bcm (if we retain the name). But I think that Paul's insistence to support the cget workflow, for which nobody at the moment cares but him, is making things more complicated and error-prone than they could be. (The cget workflow is the ability to build and install Boost libraries one by one, independently of one another, without a superproject; this requires them to refer to one another with find_package.)