14 May
2017
14 May
'17
midnight
My apologies, when my brain saw "expected" it also saw "__builtin_expect" and I immediately assumed an unlikely/likely proposal - of course that's not what it is. My bad :) On 13/05/2017 12:17 p.m., Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:
On 13/05/2017 00:53, Soul Studios via Boost wrote:
Sounds useful. I welcome a 'expected' implementation, even if, in my testing, results from this sort of thing are highly CPU-dependent and non-intuitive.
Can you clarify?
Niall