20 Aug
2018
20 Aug
'18
8:39 a.m.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 11:26, Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Then the only solution I see is to build separate binaries for different C++ versions.
Yes, or something will break, now or in the future. Adding functionality to Boost that depends on compiler implementations seems the wrong way to go, IMO, as those implementations are free to change as they please, provided they stick to the standard, which is of not much help in this context. degski -- *“If something cannot go on forever, it will stop" - Herbert Stein* *“No, it isn’t truth. Truth isn’t truth" - Rudolph W. L. Giuliani*