Re: [boost] SIMD implementation of uBLAS

If I ever had to choose I would go with boost.SIMD, because the folks at Metascale have put some really hard work shaping their library and a custom solution would only be ugly plagiarism. Also in that case consider that you outsource one of your major problems: supporting new vector instructions. You only work on them if nobody supports boost.SIMD anymore. -Nasos On 05/29/2013 09:40 AM, Aditya Avinash wrote:

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Joel Falcou wrote:

...

See our work on Boost.SIMD ...

I have a question specific to you. Implementing uBLAS with it's own SIMD code and using uBLAS with Boost.SIMD, which of these can be more faster? (performance)

-- Aditya Avinash Atluri

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost