I'm hoping to write a review, but I'm> only just getting started with the library, I'll try and get there as soon as I can...
Best, John. Thanks John, I've just turned up the encouragementyet again a notch higher, indicating that terse maybe better than absent ones. Yet we do not want to force unprepared results. If you do get a chance, we'd really like toget your review. Christopher On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 06:57:09 PM GMT+1, John Maddock via Boost
wrote:
On 23/01/2024 13:37, Christopher Kormanyos via Boost wrote:
> The review of Boost.Charconv by Matt Borland runs> Monday, January 15th through January 25th, 2024.
Dear all, This post is intended to kindly encourage thesubmission of more reviews for the proposedBoost.Charconv. We've had thoughtful, deep discussion, but we really need a few more reviews to form a solid basis for results. The review periodis formally scheduled until 25-January-2024.
I'm hoping to write a review, but I'm only just getting started with the library, I'll try and get there as soon as I can... Best, John. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost