Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [Fit] formal review starts today

9 Mar 2016

      On 2016-03-09 18:34, paul Fultz wrote:
...
...
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 4:58 PM, Vladimir Batov 
 wrote:
Maybe I need a little more explanation of components in the Quick Start 
Guide.
Perhaps, also, a comparison of writing some of the examples without 
using the
library...
I think that's an excellent idea.
...
...
... a functor. I
think it happens pretty much automatically.
Well, the library provides help for that as well, because currently in 
C++ you
can't pass generic functions to other functions, like this:
std::accumulate(v.begin(), v.end(), 0, std::max); // Compile error
However, BOOST_FIT_LIFT will let you do that:
std::accumulate(v.begin(), v.end(), 0, BOOST_FIT_LIFT(std::max));
Isn't it resolved with

std::accumulate(v.begin(), v.end(), 0, boost::bind(std::max<int>, _1, 
_2));

Seems like std binders take care of the generic functions' 
"awkwardness". Am I missing anything?
...
...
"if we construct the class as a global variable"
Should I be excited about it? Globals are often a royal pain. Do I 
want
...
to construct it a a global variable?
Whats the pain about these Global variables? They are const, can be
namespaced, and work just like free functions. However, they do have 
several
advantages.
I much prefer creating things locally to minimize the scope and the 
potential for mis-use. If I (or someone) create something (an object), 
there is a potential desire to stick some stateful info/data into it. 
Then, the complexity snow-balls as it becomes a bottleneck in 
multi-threaded env.
...
First, by making them objects we can turn functions into first-class 
citizens.
Why can't I use the standard binders to achieve that?.. Or what do I 
gain by using Fit instead?
...
skipped considerable chunk...
What I seem to hear is that Fit helps to overcome some plain-function 
limitations. I think you might want to consider highlighting what Fit 
adds compared to the standard binders. I felt that quite a few of your 
examples could be done using those binders. I might be wrong though.

V.