17 May
2013
17 May
'13
8:17 p.m.
Le 17/05/13 22:15, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
Le 14/05/13 08:16, Gaetano Mendola a écrit :
On 14/05/2013 07.46, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Now it makes sense, unlocking prematurely an unique lock without the use of an extra scope is something not natural, it is at least a weird pattern, I believe the source of the "problem" is in the implementation of that boost::detail::counter indeed as you can see it has a counter and a condition and users of it are obliged to protect both counter and condition (even if not needed) look at inc_and_notify_all for example.
To which boost::detail::counter are you referring to?
Forget this question :( Vicente