28 Sep
2017
28 Sep
'17
5:14 p.m.
Den 27-09-2017 kl. 21:39 skrev Tim Song via Boost:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost
wrote:
Anyway, my main point, which I perhaps didn't express too well, is that "introduce unsafe functions to save a branch" and "have no way to avoid expensive copies if the move constructor can potentially throw" are inconsistent.
That's true. We should do both. kind regards -T