Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review

On 12/4/2015 11:48 AM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:

On 12/4/2015 4:47 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:

...

2015-12-03 22:21 GMT+01:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé :

...

Yes, in the documentation.

documentation might need some updates - my announcement was primarly focused to the source code

Fair enough, I was misguided by the "ready for next review" subject as well as the announcement that requests from the review have been addressed. This is obviously not the case, but we can still make a lot of progress based on source code adjustments only.

The value of `future_status` enumerators is shifted when compared to the corresponding `std::` definition. This could lead to subtle mistakes for people familiarized with the standard definition. I would suggest to simply follow the normative definition from the standard here. Regards, -- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com