Re: [boost] Is there interest in a collection of call stack utilities?

Did you address any of the criticisms of your first version or design? It isn't fair to ask people to look again and find the same issues.

How does what you've done compare to Artyom Beilis' library?

I believe I did addressed all except Artyom's suggestions to use another API. This is code that uses Boost constructs and useable by older compilers. You may find this library a bit more flexible and extendable than Artyom's library but since it offers the same core functionality, I think it is ultimately a matter of choice. Regards, Aurelian