11 Sep
2014
11 Sep
'14
5:20 p.m.
On Thursday 11 September 2014 09:50:16 adzm wrote:
For example, over the years I've coded several UDP hole punch implementations, and have always wanted to submit them to boost, but they ended up depending on some non-standard functionality for things like authentication, match-making, IP address detection, etc. The alternative leads to something like ICE, but the complexity level rises quickly after that.
I think an ICE library (which is not connected to the proposed or any other transport protocol) would be a very valuable addition to Boost. I would certainly be interested in it.