3 Feb
2015
3 Feb
'15
11:44 p.m.
Neil Groves wrote:
I also understand that the direction of C++ modules makes it appear that it would be prudent to solve these dependencies in another manner, so that we are ready to adopt them rather than being forced to start the deprecation process very later and delay the adoption of modules. We can't be sure we are exactly correct, but the general direction for modules is clear enough to motivate action now.
Please feel free to enlist my help.
You might want to tell Robert that. Thanks, Steve.