Re: [boost] [Modularization] new Memory module

Peter Dimov wrote:

I suspect that the macro doesn't have one leading underscore

Good catch, it needed to be __CODEGEARC__

Well congratulations then. :-)

Thanks! :-)

I suggest we just prohibit references. We'll probably have to prohibit abstract types, too.

In that case should I keep it within boost::alignment::detail:: ? -- If it was effectively an alignment_of-equivalent, it could live within boost::alignment:: -- Glen