Re: [boost] expected<T, E...> (Was: [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far)

4 Jun 2017


      Le 04/06/2017 à 17:42, Peter Dimov via Boost a écrit :
...
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
...
...
enum unscoped_error
   {
       unscoped_other_error = 7
   };
expected test()
   {
       return unscoped_other_error; // returns 7.0
   }
...
...
unexpected_type<E> is explicitly constructible from E. expected 
is implicitly constructible from unexpected_type<E>. This avoid this 
kind of ambiguities.
Could you please try this code with your implementation?
It will work as yours. My concern is that this is not what we want, 
isn't it?
Vicente