26 Sep
2017
26 Sep
'17
7:50 a.m.
On 26 September 2017 at 09:33, degski
Then looking how the free_capacity is split between front and back we get 95 and 23 (or the other way around, depending on whether we first push_back or first push_front, even when front- and back-pushes are interleaved).
Maybe a rebalance ( size_type hint ) member function could address this issue and relocate the "zero-point" to the hinted at position (possible safe and unsafe). A clear ( size_type hint ) could do the same on clearing. degski -- "*Ihre sogenannte Religion wirkt bloß wie ein Opiat reizend, betäubend, Schmerzen aus Schwäche stillend.*" - Novalis 1798