21 Nov
2013
21 Nov
'13
8:28 p.m.
On 11/21/2013 11:07 AM, Lars Viklund wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:33:33PM -0500, Edward Diener wrote:
I disagree. When/if clang changes the particular jam file should change appropriately.
What about people that must, want to, or need to use a Boost version released with the proposed /EH muting in effect together with a future clang-cl compiler that actually implements /EH.
Why in the world would I add a compiler option to a compiler which does not support it just in case that compiler might support that compiler option in the future ?