15 Nov
2019
15 Nov
'19
1:33 p.m.
I was just pointing out that Boost PP is hardly the only Boost library which has lots of stale branches. If it is not against Boost policy to delete old, stale branches I will be glad to do so, but I was just looking for some clarification from other Boost developers first.
I believe, beyond master and develop, your usage of branches is completely at your (project members') discretion. There's no Boost-wide policy.
It is surely sensible that fully merged branches be deleted as a matter of default? I very rarely keep around fully merged branches, but I do occasionally do so mainly to retain a waypoint reference. Niall