9 Oct
2017
9 Oct
'17
11 a.m.
On 09.10.2017 05:10, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
While I personally agree, I don't think this is a choice anyone can impose on the people who have to maintain the individual boost libraries. We may encourage library maintainers to use a particular issue tracker, but ultimately the choice is theirs.
How so? You require a review for accepting Boost libraries. I don't see how requiring the use of a specific issue tracker is different. As a user it's _significantly_ better to have a single issue tracker to consider, instead of having to go on a hunt to find the right one to use for each library and managing the various login credentials. Cheers - Asbjørn