2 Jun
2015
2 Jun
'15
8:49 p.m.
Edward Diener wrote:
I think it is going to be really bad, and confusing, to set a precedent by which a library author in the midst of a review, changes the library being reviewed for any reason.
I understand where you're coming from, but (1) the changes (in directory structure, namespace and identifier naming) were done in response to reviewers' requests and not on a whim, and (2) it takes years for a library's review to be scheduled. We cannot afford to tell library authors "do please wait another three years because you made changes which were requested of you during the review."