Ohh, thanks, in this case i'll keep working on it. Regards, Attila 2017-03-17 11:07 GMT+01:00 Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org>:
2017-03-17 10:43 GMT+01:00 Attila Szenczi via Boost
:
Hello!
I knew about safe_numerics and i felt like it's different from what i want. (tho i didn't check the whole lib)
However, i didn't know about constrained_value, and it seems like this lib is exactly the same as mine. Even the design decisions are identical... so i reinvented the wheel. :'(
This proves that the library is useful, and there is a demand for it. Your energy and motivation could still be used to get the library into Boost. I can see from the review schedule http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html that this constrained_value library was even accepted, but then orphaned.
Regards, &rzej;
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost