Re: [boost] [outcome] Second high level summary of review feedback accepted so far

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:

So, if the author want's to, I believe he should be able to include CMake files

I naively assumed that the Outcome CMakeLists.txt was a straightforward, self-contained affair. After all, how complicated does it need to be for a library that provides 3 similar classes and a handful of tests? I was wrong...