Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13

On 09/04/2015 09:51 PM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:

2015-09-04 21:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller :

...

The problematic portion in std::mutex/boost::mutex is exactly the missing mechanism how to yield in the correct way. Even if you implement a mechanism like in the blog post you mentioned, the problem hasn't been solved.

why would be boost::this_fiber::yield() inappropriate?

It's inappropriate for anything not running in a boost fiber execution context.

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost