Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?

On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:33 PM, Nevin Liber wrote:

On 4 January 2014 11:34, Niall Douglas wrote:

...

Also, more controversial features, techniques or ideas which wouldn't pass peer review are deliberately kept till after admission.

Do you have an example of this?

I can only suppose that AFIO will be such a library if it should pass review some day, and that makes me uncomfortable.

IMHO, this seems like it would be an abuse of the trust given to Boost developers.

Thanks, Nevin. I was planning a similar reply. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)