On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:54, Robert Ramey via Boost
On 3/15/21 9:48 AM, Richard Hodges via Boost wrote:
Boost Describe Review Summary
Exercise for the reader:Contrast the Boost procedures for achieving approval with that of the C++ committee. What does this teach us - if anything?
Thank you Robert. I have taken your clarification to heart. It will no doubt be useful in the upcoming review of Boost.MySQL, which is likely to be _a lot more controversial_. I do understand that not all votes have equal weight. I was careful to judge the reasoning behind the stated conditions, and took note of the back-and-forth on the list during the ten days. I fully agree with regard to the committee. It has been nothing but a cause of frustration and anger for the community of developers who actually use C++ to get work done. I have the strong impression that very few on the committee ever produce anything of strategic value for their employers.
Robert Ramey
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Richard Hodges hodges.r@gmail.com office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212