Re: [boost] [outcome] Second high level summary of review feedback accepted so far

Le 30/05/2017 à 16:58, Niall Douglas via Boost a écrit :

4. Given where Vicente appears to be heading next with expected it may be wise to make the static_checked_* varieties use std::variant<...> for storage when being compiled on C++ 17. https://github.com/ned14/boost.outcome/issues/53

I'm not heading nothing. All my comments about expectedwhere if we had in the hope you defined outcome variadic ;-) We can have C++14 (or even C++11) version of std::variant. Just someone needs to port it. It would be even better if we had also a never-empty variant. Best, Vicente