Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review

On 12/4/2015 11:48 AM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:

On 12/4/2015 4:47 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:

...

2015-12-03 22:21 GMT+01:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé :

...

Yes, in the documentation.

documentation might need some updates - my announcement was primarly focused to the source code

Fair enough, I was misguided by the "ready for next review" subject as well as the announcement that requests from the review have been addressed. This is obviously not the case, but we can still make a lot of progress based on source code adjustments only.

...

* addressed: - re-factoring of future<> and related classes

I assume this ^ refers to the following piece of feedback: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/09/225289.php The refactoring does not appear to have happened for `promise`. Is this intentional, or just an oversight? In the futures, `wait_for` and `wait_until` stand out as they have been defined to forward to base instead of simply using `using`. Is there a reason for that? Regards, -- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com